Comments on: Your Pastor the “Twitter” http://sundayresources.net/neil/2009/03/25/your-pastor-the-twitter/ Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:00:36 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Neil http://sundayresources.net/neil/2009/03/25/your-pastor-the-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2171 Neil Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:27:06 +0000 http://sundayresources.net/neil/?p=88#comment-2171 Hello Soul, I would be VERY wary about sharing any personal information via any means, even with the person's permission. If others think what they tell you might end up in your next twitter, they won't share with you. Hello Soul,
I would be VERY wary about sharing any personal information via any means, even with the person’s permission. If others think what they tell you might end up in your next twitter, they won’t share with you.

]]> By: Soul Pundi http://sundayresources.net/neil/2009/03/25/your-pastor-the-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2170 Soul Pundi Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:53:59 +0000 http://sundayresources.net/neil/?p=88#comment-2170 Question: What are your thoughts on pastors sharing and commenting on the problems that their congregation brings to them anonymously. That is to say discussing, polling and talking about the issues that individuals are going through via Twitter. Does the benefit to the congregation outweigh any confidentiality assumed by the individuals? How does this affect individual counseling? Are the congregants entitled to believe that their situation will remain confidential? Does the fact that the names are not revealed keep confidentiality intact? Just curious what your thoughts were? Question: What are your thoughts on pastors sharing and commenting on the problems that their congregation brings to them anonymously. That is to say discussing, polling and talking about the issues that individuals are going through via Twitter. Does the benefit to the congregation outweigh any confidentiality assumed by the individuals? How does this affect individual counseling? Are the congregants entitled to believe that their situation will remain confidential? Does the fact that the names are not revealed keep confidentiality intact?

Just curious what your thoughts were?

]]>